← Blog
Comparison4 min read

MANA vs SMEMOVE: an SME accounting app with stock and payroll, and a workspace built for one freelancer

These two tools answer different questions

If the question in your head is “how do I keep the books correct, file the right forms, and hand clean data to my accountant,” SMEMOVE was built for exactly that. If the question is “where is each job, who hasn't paid me, and will next month cover itself,” that's a different job — and the one MANA was built for.

Here's the comparison as each product actually is, not as either would like to be seen.

What SMEMOVE does well

SMEMOVE is Thai cloud accounting software aimed at SME owners, startups and online shops. Its strength is genuine accounting depth:

Pricing as listed on SMEMOVE's package comparison page in August 2026: a free tier with 1 user and 200 MB (standard document theme, no e-Tax), Basic at ฿199/month or ฿1,990/year for 5 users, Premium at ฿399/month for 10 users, and Pro at ฿699/month for 15 users. Data sits on Google Cloud, the site claims over 6,000 companies using it, and there are arrangements for accounting firms handling multiple entities. Worth re-checking current pricing on their site before you commit.

If you carry stock, employ people who need payroll and social security, or work with a bookkeeper who closes your accounts, SMEMOVE is a lot of software for the money — and it covers ground MANA simply doesn't.

Where a solo freelancer gets stuck

Freelance work rarely ends at the ledger. It ends at delivery and collection, and three things sit outside what an accounting package is designed to do.

The work and the money live apart. Accounting software knows an invoice was issued. It doesn't know the project is 70% done, which milestone is next, or what's still open on your task list. So you end up running two or three tools side by side.

You pay for features you never open. Inventory, payroll and time attendance are the heart of SMEMOVE. A one-person business touches almost none of it.

Getting paid is a client-side problem. What actually shortens payment time is a link the client can open to view the invoice, pay by PromptPay, and attach the slip without registering for anything — not a nicer balance sheet.

Where MANA sits

MANA is not a double-entry accounting system and doesn't pretend to be. It's a workspace covering the whole freelance job in one place:

Pricing: a usable Free plan, Mana at ฿290/month or ฿2,900/year, Aether at ฿890/month or ฿8,900/year, with annual billed as ten months.

Side by side

SMEMOVE MANA
Built for SME and shop accounting, and accounting firms Solo freelancers and very small teams
Projects and tasks Not included Included, linked to clients and documents
Inventory Yes, with serial numbers No
Payroll and time attendance Yes, with the TIMEMOVE app No
Thai tax forms and RD Prep PND/PP forms, RD Prep export No — you file yourself or hand data to a bookkeeper
e-Tax Invoice by Email On paid tiers For Thai VAT-registered users
Client-side PromptPay payment link Not the focus Yes, with slip attachment booked as income
Personal cash-flow forecasting Accounting-style receipts/payments projection Yes, tied to wallets and monthly budgets
AI assistant Not the focus Built in, including receipt import from photos

One question decides it

Ask yourself: last month, what ate more of your time — keeping the books right, or chasing work and chasing money?

If it was the books — because you hold stock, employ people, file PP 30 monthly, or your accountant needs RD Prep files — SMEMOVE is the better answer, and good value at that price.

If it was chasing work and money — because you work in projects, juggle clients who pay on different cycles, get 3% withheld on everything, and need to know in advance whether next month is covered — that's the question MANA was designed around.

And if you're in the middle, say a VAT-registered freelancer with a bookkeeper closing the accounts, running the daily work, documents and cash in MANA and handing your accountant a periodic export is a sensible split that doesn't mean paying twice for the same thing.